Meditation: The Art of Ada Sadler

Her paintings are meditations. All of Ada Sadler‘s recent works are oil paintings. All are painted on panels, either 6″ x 6″ or 9″ x 9″. The subjects are all ordinary objects. More often than not, she paints chairs. The settings are exceedingly quiet. The works are repetitive, almost like a Buddhist chant. And, in a similar way, they allow for focus – both for the viewer, and even more importantly, for the artist.

I recently saw a movie about a renowned Japanese sushi chef: “Jiro Dreams of Sushi”. It is the story of Jiro Ono, widely considered to be one of the greatest sushi chefs in the world. The movie is a wonderful study of “character”. Not to over-simplify, but his entire life has been an exercise in repetition: reproducing the same thing again and again, but not in a mechanical way – rather in a way that has allowed for small, incremental changes in the pursuit of excellence. Counter-intuitively, by constraining his subject matter and maintaining an almost ritualistic daily routine, his creativity has been unleashed. This is what made me think of Ada Sadler’s work – the constrained subject matter, the attention to detail and the process of refinement, all sustained over a long period of time. Her precise renderings of chairs and bathtub toys are journeys of creative exploration, more meta-physical than physical.

The works that first caught my eye were a series of small works featuring wind-up bathtub toys. However, her better-known, larger body of work features chairs. In both of the series, there is nothing exceptional about the physical objects. They are specifically, even overtly, ordinary. They are quintessential examples of the modern evolution of still life. There will be an exhibition later this summer opening at the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, entitled “Significant Objects: The Spell of Still Life”. The curator of that exhibition, Gloria Williams Sander, has done a wonderfully succinct job of organizing that exhibition (and the genre of still life, in general) from four perspectives: “Depiction & Desire” – the wonder and magic that collections of objects can inspire; “Virtuosity” – the technical mastery of medium that astonishes all of us; “Decoding the Still Life” – the symbolism imbedded in still life compositions; and “Still Life off the Table” – the more expansive definitions of what constitutes still life that have emerged in the last century. While Ada is not in that exhibition, all four of these perspectives apply to and inform her work.

In her two signature series of paintings: “Bathtubbie Collection” and “Chairs” (which include several different sub-series), Ada Sadler demonstrates virtuoso control of light and color. The objects themselves are rendered in exquisite detail; and, like some old master paintings, the hand of the artist is disguised. The works are not “painterly”. The unadorned objects are front and center – stars of the paintings. The Chairs are not collections in a classic sense; rather they are surrogates for collections of memories. The Bathtubbies, on the other hand, are specifically collectibles. Unlike classic still life, these are not arranged collections on a table top. Ada photographs her objects – sometimes arranged, sometime not; then, she transforms her photographs in the paintings. The paintings may superficially appear to be literal renditions, but they are not.

I met with Ada over coffee recently. We discussed her background – studying art at the University of Kansas; detouring into administrative work to make ends meet; then, re-emerging as an artist in the late 80’s and early 90’s with pastels. Initially she showed at alternative venues, such as The Right Spot Bar and SF Open Studios. Her work was discovered and championed by a local San Francisco gallerist, Joe Chowing (now retired). She was juried into ArtSpan’s prestigious “Selections” exhibitions in both 1997 and 1998. Along the way, she transitioned to oil painting. Works that had featured populated landscapes with palm trees and swimming pools, began to lose the people. The compositions became simpler and more focused. Eventually, they ended up with just chairs.

We discussed still life in general. We discussed how it is tempting to characterize her works as photo-realistic, but how they fall squarely into the classic tradition of still life. In line with that tradition, I asked if the objects in the paintings were symbolic. It was a loaded question and they are. In a sense, she pointed out, the works developed into obsessions: 30+ works of souvenir cups & saucers; nearly 100 works featuring collectible bathtubbies; and 200+ works featuring chairs. The works are explorations of loss, but not in an anguished way. She recalled listening on the radio to a song in which the writer had talked about loss and the need to let go. She disagreed. She does not need or want to let go. Her paintings are touch points: the cups and saucers – a conversation with her mother; the bathtubbies – a conversation with children that never were; and, the chairs – a conversation with her father whom she lost to Altzheimer’s. There is a reason why the paintings, which are devoid of people, have such a powerful sense of presence.

Ada Sadler’s new works will be in an exhibition at Dolby Chadwick Gallery which opens this Thursday from 5:30-7:30 pm. The exhibition will continue through July 7th.  This is Ada’s seventh solo exhibition at Dolby Chadwick Gallery, who has represented her for the past 14 years.  Inquiries should directed to the gallery.

Night Eyes

While fully half of our life passes in the night, still it remains in many ways foreign to us. We take for granted that what we are seeing in the daytime is what is there. At night, however, that same place can be completely transformed. There is a sense of something just out of view, lurking. We become hyper-aware as we stretch our sensory muscles. Edward Hopper in an interview about his iconic painting “Nighthawks” said that the painting had more to do with the possibility of predators in the night than with loneliness. And, it is that sense of possibilities that night photography seeks to explore.

For photographers, Manu and Greta Schnetzler the night is an adventure. Not all places are equally transformed by the night. It takes night eyes to see the potential for magic and mystery in a place that seems quite mundane in the daytime. So, when a candidate is discovered, re-visiting the place at night is a must. Photography is uniquely qualified as an art form to capture the emotion that the qualities of night evoke. We always feel that there is something unseen just outside of our perception; and, the camera actually captures a piece of that. Michael Kenna observed that the photography at night “has an unpredictable character – our eyes cannot see cumulatively, like film. So what is being photographed is often impossible for us to see. Certainly it’s a good antidote for pre-visualization”.

Manu and Greta have both been photographing since childhood. Their paths crossed paths nearly twenty years ago at Stanford. There, appropriately enough, they bonded over a Hasselblad. On an early adventure to Zion and Bryce National Parks, they first began photographing at night. Night photography is technically quite challenging and lends itself well to collaboration. Often there are multiple cameras, all shooting with different exposures. Lighting is jury-rigged. And, at the end of the shoot, it can be difficult to identify who authored any particular shot. The resulting arguments over who authored which images were soon resolved by simply declaring all images to be collaborations.

Over the years, they have been drawn to what they describe as “unnoticed places”. Always they are places that have a very different presence at night than during the day. As with the Potrero Hill gas pumps in the banner image, they often end up photographing things that “have been left behind to decay or to be destroyed”. I asked Greta Schnetzler to describe a favorite photo shoot. She showed me a photograph that they took near Bode in the desert. It was a group outing with The Nocturnes, an amazing group of loosely affiliated night photographers here in the Bay Area, founded by Tim Baskerville. The group came across an abandoned trailer. Greta and Manu were certain that everyone would come back that night to photograph it, but astonishingly they were the only ones. The Schnetzler’s are very “old school”. They use an old Hasselblad camera, a few Holgas and recently an 8 x 10 view camera. The photograph on Fuji Velvia film. For this shoot, they lit the trailer with hand-held flashlights and gels. Otherwise, the image is unaltered.

Many times the subject is a very ordinary object – such as a simple park bench in their San Francisco neighborhood. In an article by the French poet, Laureline Amanieux, the resulting image was described: “What does a bench do in the night while I sleep? Does it suffer from its sudden solitude or does the bench live much more without the trace of a body?” This anthropomorphizing of ordinary objects is a power that the night possesses. Film, as it slows the light, uniquely captures that. In the hands of the Schneltzer’s, the camera is a tool for exploring their environment. It is a way to see beyond what is immediately visible; capturing images that, at their best, reveal not only what is seen in these night places, but also what is felt. Manu & Greta Schneltzer participate annually in the San Francisco Open Studios with The Noctournes. They have shown in numerous exhibitions here and abroad. Their work was recently featured in B&W Magazine. Studio visits can be arranged by appointment.

“Ok to Burn” – John Fitzsimmons

On the afternoon of October 25, 2003, a hunter in the Cleveland National Park became disoriented.  He lit a small fire to signal for help.  By the time that they announced the fire had been contained a week and a half later, almost 300,000 acres had burned, nearly 3000 buildings had been destroyed and fifteen people had lost their lives.  It was the largest fire in California history.

In 1970, John Fitzsimmons and Kat Flyn drifted to San Diego from New York City.  It was not part of any real plan, but John got a job as a teacher and Kat started the first vintage clothing store in that city.  The store was successful and John soon joined the business.  Some of the customers wanted to rent the vintage clothing rather than buy it.  The next thing you know, a small costume spin-off business was born, ultimately swallowing up the original business.  It was quite successful and thirty years later, they began planning their retirement.  They built their dream home just outside of San Diego, surrounded by towering pines, near the national forest, in the town of Cuyamaca.

As part of their business, Kat had designed some of the costumes and John had photographed some of the models.  It was artistic to a degree, but both dreamed of seriously pursuing art.  Kat, who was and is a talented assemblage artist, had taken boxes and boxes of materials from the business, storing them in the basement of their home.   A lifetime of artist supplies was assembled and ready to go.  Then, on October 27th and 28th, the fire reached Cuyamaca and all 120 homes in that community were incinerated.

Remarkably, both John and Kat not only physically survived the fire; emotionally, as well, they rose from the ashes like the proverbial phoenix.  John photographed the aftermath of the fire.  He took the photographs to a local gallery and had his first solo show.  It was a new beginning.

With no trees and no real prospect for trees, they decided not to rebuild in Cuyamaca.  Almost arbitrarily, they moved up to San Francisco.  They loved it right away.  Artistically, they moved to the SOMA Artist Studios, where they still maintain a studio, and they began making art.  Kat produces wonderful assemblages.  She also collaborates with John on his photography, making the trademark frames that work so well with his photographs of urban decay.

I have always been particularly drawn to that body of John’s work.  Last year, in the “Guerrilla Show” at Arc Gallery, I was ready to buy “Green Trailer, Salton Sea” when someone snatched it off the wall just in front of me.  I went to Open Studios in October hoping to find a similar work.  Then I noticed a photograph of three abandoned homes in Atascadero.  I had to have it.  The work, shown here in the banner for this story, was called “Ok to Burn”.  At that time, I did not know anything about their personal story.  It was only when I began writing this profile that the significance of the work become apparent.

John’s photography divides into two broad categories of work:  urban decay and fantasy.  The fantasy work has a staged element to it.  It is a touchstone back to the costume design business.  John cites contemporary influences such as Maggie Taylor and Jerry Uelsmann.  Overtly manipulated, the photographs are visual collages of imagery that explore themes of sex, bigotry, drugs, global warming.

The other works, which explore themes of urban decay, will be prominently on display next week in the Arc Gallery exhibition “FourSquared”, where John will be one of the sixteen featured artists.  These works have a political edge.  They revisit American glory, now left behind and rotting away.  Cars are abandoned and rusting.  Drive-in movie theaters are overgrown.  Houses are ok to burn.  Even the landscape itself is allowed to deteriorate from willful neglect in a series of works photographed in the Salton Sea.  The images are powerful, yet somewhat ambiguous; nostalgic, yet somehow bittersweet.  They evoke memories of the longing in Charles Foster Kane’s plantive last word: “Rosebud”.

You can see John Fitzsimmon’s work in the upcoming Arc Gallery exhibition: “FourSquared”, opening on Saturday, August 27th and continuing through September 28th.  He will be participating in San Francisco Fall Open Studios, the weekend of October 14th.  You can also contact John directly for a studio visit by appointment.

Marks Left Behind – The Work of Camilla Newhagen

What is the nature of art?  That is, of course, the subject of endless debate and many books.  For me personally, what elevates some art is an element of exploration in the work that transcends or informs the object that is produced.

Growing up in a small, socialist enclave just outside of Copenhagen during the politically active 70’s, Camilla Newhagen was surrounded by intense intellectual discourse about the world around her.  The discussions were challenging and engaging.  She developed a heightened awareness of the world that was rooted in that experience.  Her formal education was in art and design at the Danish design school, Desingskolen Kolding.  So, it was a natural progression for her to combine her socially-engaged childhood with her art.  When she moved to America in the late 1990’s, she began exploring the stark differences between American culture and Danish culture.  Art was a vocabulary for that discussion.

I recently met for coffee with Camilla and we discussed the topic of cultural differences.  I spoke a lot about the differences between Japanese and American culture.  For Camilla, it was the somewhat more subtle, but still substantial differences between Danish and American culture.  And, more recently, it has been differences within those cultures in how men and women are perceived and how they interact.

After the meeting and in response to the lively discussion that we had, Camilla sent me some of the ideas and quotes that she was posting on the wall of her studio by way of helping her to formulate an artistic statement for an upcoming exhibition at Jack Fischer Gallery.

“Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards” – Kierkegaard

Much of Camilla’s work grapples with the idea of making sense of our world by examining the marks that are left behind as we pass through life.  There is this idea that memories are embedded in the objects that we have touched; physically manifested and preserved in these materials.  And, somehow, in ways that are not entirely clear, by utilizing the materials – found objects – in sculpture, those experiences are transmitted and become a part of the piece.

“Psychological scars interest me, taboo and the impact they have on our physical bodies”

Camilla had a studio in the Mission district of San Francisco.  It was an area of San Francisco that was frequented by a lot of prostitutes.  She was fascinated by the physical impact that this life had on its participants.  Aging was not uniform.  From the back, the bodies of many of the women remained attractive.  However, close up, the horrible impact on their faces could not be ignored.  Housed in the same building as her studio was a second-hand store.  Camilla would purchase second-hand women’s undergarments from the store; deconstruct the garments; and re-assemble them into soft sculptures.  The result was an exhibition: “What Women Want” which is more of a question than an answer.

“Identity crisis interest me, new beginnings and transformation”

Moving to America in 1998 after becoming newly married, Camilla started to explore what it was like to be a man vicariously through her observations of her husband.  Her starting point in many of her explorations is specific.  Her process is to study some something specific – in this case, her husband and her father – as a means of understanding something more universally – in this case, men.  The study of her husband resulted in a 2009 exhibition:  “My Husband”.  And, that study continues in a more generalized fashion in her current exhibition which features works re-constructed from recycled men’s suits and dress shirts.  She studies the burdens that men carry in their lives and the marks those burdens leave behind in their unofficial uniforms.

“Things unsaid”

I asked Camilla if she started her work with a specific idea in mind, or if she simply started sewing her pieces together and they took their own direction.  For her, it was both.  There is always an idea that she has in mind when she starts the piece, but she also allows the media itself to exert a measure of control.  The finished piece often continues to have a mind of its own.  Once finished, there is always the question of whether or not the piece is successful.  Does the piece have a voice?  What is it saying?  She will place the piece off in the corner of the room and stare at it for days.  And, interestingly the piece continues to evolve.  Reinterpretation often takes her in a unexpected and different direction.  The pieces do not speak but they have a voice.

Camilla Newhagen is currently studying in the MFA program at Mills College.  She recently exhibited one of her works, Dominatrix, in an exhibition at ARC Gallery in San Francisco:  “Dollhouse” – that was juried by Jack Fischer.  That work led to her upcoming exhibition at Jack Fischer Gallery: “Coupling” where she and John Hundt are the featured artists, that is opening this Saturday, March 12th from 3-5pm.  You can see Camilla’s work in that exhibition through May 7th.  You can also arrange to see Camilla’s work by appointment.

Play – The Art of Audrey Heller

Earlier this year, my gallery partners and I came up with a concept for a juried exhibition for the holiday season at ARC Gallery: “Dollhouse”. We were hoping for artistic visions that took the concept of dolls and dollhouses to unexpected places. One of my favorite works, selected by the juror, Jack Fischer of the eponymous downtown gallery, was a photograph by San Francisco artist, Audrey Heller entitled “Measure”. In the photograph, Audrey has created a fully realized world where two figures pass time waiting on rulers reminiscent of the rulers I used back in elementary school half a century ago. What is being measured? Is it the time that they are spending waiting? Is it the longer passage of time from the 50’s and 60’s until now? Is it something altogether different? Audrey creates a world that implies a story, and then allows us, the viewers, to fill in the text.

One of Audrey’s most prized possessions, as a child, was a miniature farm set complete with a barn, animals and people.  Her form of play was to carefully stage tableaux and leave them up for weeks.  It was not a surprise when, as a young adult, she went on to study theater, and more specifically set and lighting design, at UC Santa Cruz and Northwestern University.  Much of her work has a distinctly theatrical feel.

Recently I sat down with Audrey over a glass of wine and we browsed through her book, Overlooked Undertakings.  The images in this book are all staged with German miniatures.  Each seems like a snapshot of a scene in a play.  While Audrey does not supply the narrative, one distinctly has a sense of a pause in the action.  There is something that has happened leading up to this moment; and shortly one feels that the action will resume.  For me, it is that feeling of a pause that makes the work special.

One of the pieces that Audrey specifically chose to talk about was “Walkers”.  It is not an obvious choice.  It is a deceptively simple image: a small girl follows after a group of adults disappearing into the shadows.  However, because the image is ambiguous, the possibilities of a story are myriad.

I particularly enjoy some of the recurring characters.  A number of images feature scuba divers who seem to be constantly in search of open water.  In one work, a diver is poised over a small pot in a watercolor set.  In another, a diver searches for the ocean in a bag of goldfish crackers.  My personal favorite in this series is “Red Sea” where a pair of divers has climbed up a watermelon in search of the sea, only to be once again thwarted.  Her characters are underdogs.  They strive and they fall short.  But they persevere. Undeterred, they strive again and again.

Another series of works has figurines polishing and touching up roses.  It is hard, behind the scenes work that goes unnoticed and unappreciated.  It is both clever, but also subtly political.  One understands why Fotofolio publishes some of Audrey’s work as greeting cards.  The images are amusing and accessible.  But, for me, it is the slightly subversive back stories that take the work to another level.

You can currently view Audrey Heller’s photography at DeLaSole Footwear in the Castro.  She also is in the current group exhibition at ARC Gallery:  “Dollhouse” in SOMA.  She will be participating in the Artists Talk there Saturday, January 8th from 1-3pm.  And, she will be at the Juror/Artists’ Reception on Thursday, January 13th from 6-8pm.

This spring, Audrey will be showing her work at two Texas art festivals:  The Bayou City Arts Festival in Houston – March 25-27th and The Main Street Fort Worth Art Festival in Fort Worth – April 14-17th.  You can also see Audrey’s photography at her studio here in San Francisco by appointment.

Deconstruct Reconstruct: The Art of John Waguespack

Our conversation meandered.  We spoke about his journey from finance to graphic design and then to painting.  We spoke about the “big break” – getting a solo exhibition at a fine art gallery without the requisite CV – no group exhibitions, no art awards, no articles in prestigious art journals, no work in prominent private or public collections.  We spoke about philosophy – Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World” instead of George Orwell’s “1984”; how we seemed to have ended up in a world of information overload, where it is hard to know what is true and where we are desensitized to what we see and what we hear.  But mostly, we spoke about how we as human beings explore and make sense of the world around us and our place in that world.  It was not the conversation that I had expected.

I met with John Waguespack at the McLoughlin Gallery, the site of his current exhibition of new works.  Joan McLoughlin, the gallerist, was there with John.  Initially, I was most curious about how an unknown artist garnered a high profile solo exhibition.  Joan shared her experiences working in start-up companies in Silicon Valley – a successful career that allowed her to pursue her passion for art and become a gallerist.  She considers herself very fortunate and so part of her mission in the arts is to share that good fortune.  She gives back a portion of all sales to charity.  And, she is also very open to exhibiting new artists and giving them the opportunity to be seen.  A mutual friend and a fan of John’s work (which he became acquainted with through San Francisco Open Studios) made the introduction.  The large-scale mixed media works were very much in keeping with Joan’s sensibility.  More importantly, she was able to relate to his work intellectually and emotionally.  The paintings were social commentary without being obvious.  Those factors, combined with what had become a substantial body of work, led her to offer John the exhibition opportunity.  This is the first solo exhibition she has mounted for a previously unknown artist.

John grew up in the South.  The boom and bust times of the dot.com era in the 90’s and early 00’s, combined with a business school education, brought John to the West Coast.  He started out with a Japanese company in Silicon Valley helping them to market bad technology on the path to bankruptcy.  It was a blessing.  He received a severance which allowed him to contemplate the possibility that he was on the wrong path in life.  Returning to Atlanta, he attended a design school.  This was a step in the right direction, though still not entirely fine art.  He got a job with an ad agency back in the Bay Area.  Surviving there for nearly five years, he was able to land another severance package. This afforded the luxury to reinvent himself yet again – this time as an artist, a painter.

For the past several years, John painted nearly full-time, much of that time in semi-isolation.  He exhibited his work in Open Studios and in alternative venues, but mostly he just painted non-stop.  He retained some graphic design jobs to help pay the bills, but his focus was his art.  From his earliest experiences in school, visual vocabulary had always made more sense to him than written vocabulary.  He now firmly committed himself to exploring the world and his relationship to the world using that vocabulary.

Growing up in the South, which is quite conservative and was even more so then, John did not “come out” as a gay man until he was 26.  This was a watershed moment for him.  In one of the prominent works in the current exhibition: “1971”, John re-visited the year in which he was born.  He wanted to go back to “the beginning” and re-think his upbringing and his assumptions.  His approach is interesting.  As a culture, we have a very constrained attention span.  The media takes a complex series of events and edits them down to sound bites. John’s work is very much a product of these times.  He heavily researches his materials.  Then he distills the result in ways that say as much about him as they say about the ostensible subject.  It is transformed into a series of visual bites.  1971 is deconstructed, and then reconstructed as a highlight film:  Jim Morrison and Charles Manson; The Colts and the Cowboys; Soul Train and Nascar; Nixon and All In The Family.

In another work, “Lincoln in Metal”, John visually poses the question: “What would Lincoln think of the current world if he was reincarnated today?”.  This is a heavily textured work built up in many layers.  Layering is not so much a reflection of conscious technique as it is a reflection of sub-conscious process.  It is like an internal dialogue on the subject.  Ideas are entertained, modified, rejected, accepted, and finalized.  Only, instead of a verbal dialogue, in this case it is a visual dialogue.  And, the layers of the re-worked surface are the wake it leaves in the water.

Perhaps the best example of this process is his work: “Resurrecting Liberty”.  Here John explores the world in the aftermath of 9/11.  It is a great example because the consequences of 9/11 continue to unfold.  So, he kept re-painting the work over and over again.  Fortunately, he pulled out digital points in time along the journey.  This leaves us with a record of the internal dialogue. He said that he wishes that he had kept some of the works, rather than painting over them as his point of view on the events changed.  However, I believe that conceptually it is the process of visual exploration that makes the work interesting; and if there are casualties along the way – so be it.

I often ask artists how they know that a work is done.  John’s answer to the question was very illuminating.  He said that he knows that he is done when a work stops bothering him.

The current exhibition at McLoughlin Gallery has been extended through mid-January.  There is a “First Thursdays” reception next week on January 6th from 5:30-7:30 pm.  McLoughlin Gallery is located in the 49 Geary gallery complex near Union Square.  After the exhibition closes, work can be viewed by appointment.

London Bridge Is Falling Down

For reasons that are not entirely clear to me, I am often drawn to art that chronicles urban decay.  I particularly love the abandoned buildings that dot the waterfront in San Francisco and the artist studio buildings that have taken root in that landscape, from the Noonan Building at Pier 70 to the Shipyard at Hunters Point.  It is not clear if Jenny Robinson’s choice to locate her studio at the Shipyard was cause or effect.  It is clear that her work is deeply rooted in that, and similar, urban landscapes.

With particular emphasis on the ordinary features of her city surroundings, Jenny chronicles the “cycle of decay and renewal” that impact our bridges, highway interchanges, billboards and, my favorite, the under-maintained industrial buildings.  She notes that “by exploring the dichotomy of these often abandoned structures, at once monumental and fragile, unsightly yet beautiful, I aim to bring attention to the drama of the over-looked and abandoned corners of the world”.

Jenny’s journey began in Borneo.  Her father was an expatriate engineer.  She spent much of her childhood growing up there; and later, traveling between Southeast Asia and Britain when she, like many children of expatriates, attended boarding school in London.  From early on, she exhibited a facility in drawing.  She carried a sketchbook everywhere, fascinated by the differences in light and shadow.  From these early experiences. she developed a taste for travel that persists to this day.

In the 80’s, she formally entered art school in West Surrey.  There she was exposed to every possible medium and technique.  Britain was a great place to study art.  All of the material costs were covered.  Art students could freely explore their world and find their voice.  Jenny found that printmaking (and to a lesser extent, photography) was where her creativity best flowed.  That was where she took her “foundations”.  After college, she worked in the commercial art worlds of design, illustration and animation.  In the later, she had quite fortuitously made a connection through a friend with film and video producers.  She worked on films creating special effects.  The work was project-oriented and it paid well.  With each project, she would save up; then use her savings to go traveling.  As was her habit, everywhere she went, she carried her sketchbook.  She would also bring a camera for “back-up” photographs.  The art that she produced was, in her own words, “popular, but a little too romantic”.   Before she became a captive of her own success, she changed directions.  The early work had focused on light and shadow, but it was, in her opinion, overly pretty.  She started to sketch grittier, urban subject matter; and her color palette began to focus on the ochre’s and gray’s that dominate her current works.

Jenny’s work continues to evolve.  At first, she tended to rely more heavily on the photographic references.  Stylistically, the work was very detailed.  More recently, she has made a conscious decision to rely more heavily on the sketches.  The result has been work with a more painterly quality.  Technically, the work has also evolved.  Printmakers are, according to Jenny, a very generous community.  They attend workshops together and share techniques.  So her work is always growing technically.  I am particularly intrigued with her current printmaking technique, which owes a lot to both monotype and dry-point.  She actually creates her images on cardboard, illustration board to be precise.  After creating the image, she seals the illustration board with varnish.  She then carves into that sealed “plate” from which she prints, in a process similar to dry-point.  This allows her to create the detailed drawing of the infrastructure which is her subject.  Then, to achieve the more painterly quality, she adds the color washes in 4-6 passes, in a technique that owes more to monoprinting.

Jenny has taught at the Academy of Art and Chico State.  She is currently a resident artist at Kala in Berkeley.  She teaches workshops regularly at ICA in San Jose and at the San Francisco Center for the Book.  She also participates nationally in various residency and workshop programs, including this past summer at the Cabrillo Arts Summer Santa Cruz Workshops.  She has exhibited nationally and internationally.  Currently, she has gallery representation at Davidson Gallery in Seattle & Warnock Fine Arts in Palm Springs.  This weekend you can see her work during San Francisco Open Studios Weekend Four.  And, her studio is also open by appointment.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 47 other followers